ChrisOLeary.com > Projects > The Pain Papers > Issue 5

The Pain Papers

8/19/2001

The Pain Papers
Newsletter #5 - August 19, 2001
Copyright (c) 2001 Christopher K. O'Leary
All Rights Reserved

—————————————————————————————
THOUGHTS
—————————————————————————————

MEDIA HAVE CONSEQUENCES
As you may know, I am always on the look for Killer Phrases. These are statements that we or others make that squelch innovation. Some of my favorite Killer Phrases are...

- Don't rock the boat.
- Come on, be reasonable.
- One person can't make a difference.

I came across one the other day that, while seemingly innocuous, has a lot to say about why progress does not happen or happens so slowly. The Killer Phrase is...

"It is a poor carpenter who blames his tools."

To understand why this is a Killer Phrase, you first need to understand the work of Marshall McLuhan. Marshall McLuhan is a media theorist whose is most famous for having said...

"The medium is the message."

While there is a great deal of debate about exactly what McLuhan meant when he said this, I interpret this statement as meaning in part that that media are not neutral. They have consequences. In other words...
The message that one wishes to convey is inextricably intertwined with and affected by the medium that is used to convey it.
     For example, TV is a one-way, visual medium. It is not an interactive medium (yelling at your TV doesn't count as interaction, since the sender of the message cannot hear you).
     In contrast, an Internet chat room is a two-way, text-based medium. It is interactive because people can respond to each others statements. However, they cannot see each other.
     The message "Vote for Al Gore for President" conveyed through a TV commercial will have a different level of impact and be perceived very differently than the same message conveyed through an Internet chat room.
     The fact that the message is being carried on the TV implicitly says something about the sender. As a result, it may carry more perceived authority. Also, the fact that this message, when conveyed through the TV, cannot be challenged impacts the receiver of the message.
     The same statement made in an Internet chat room is likely to be handled very differently. For one thing, the message cannot be accompanied with patriotic imagery and music. The recipients of the message can also respond to the message to the sender within a few moments - and those who disagree are likely to do so in a much more aggressive manner than they would if they and the other people were in the same room.
     I have seen the consequences of media in my own life. Let me give you a couple of examples.
     First, this newsletter exists because I found that the prior medium that I used to convey my ideas, the essay, was too heavy-weight. I felt that I had to get things just right before I could release a new essay. I have now shifted to this lighter-weight format because it allows me to publish more information more often.
     Second, I love to BBQ. I also moved recently. I have found that I now BBQ several times a week at my new house while before I was lucky to BBQ several times a year.
What is the difference?
     The difference is that at my old house I had a charcoal BBQ pit while at my new house I have an in-ground Natural Gas BBQ pit.
     The difference in the usability of the two BBQ pits is dramatic. Before, it would take me an hour to get ready to BBQ, plus I would have to deal with all of the ash that was left over. Now, it takes me just 1 minute to get ready to BBQ and it is a clean and easy process - turn the knob and light the match.
     The impact of usability on the frequency with which I use these two tools (Gas BBQ Pit vs. Charcoal BBQ Pit) should lead to some serious thinking by anyone (like cell phone companies) whose business depends on frequency of use.
     Think razors and blades.
     So what does this have to do with carpenters blaming their tools?
     Well, just like TV, Internet chat rooms, essays, newsletters, and BBQ pits are media, so too are many others tools that we use, including the tools that we use to create other products and services.
     Different tools will alter the way we do the same job, and the use of different tools can improve the process.
This is controversial point. Some may feel that the carpenter should blame himself when he fails to hit the nail squarely. He should just pay more attention to what he is doing.
This attitude is especially prevalent when it comes to carpenters who have already mastered the conventional hammer.
     However, I believe that the inability of the carpenter to hit the nail squarely on the head says as much about the design of the hammer as it does about the user.
Perhaps the hammer is not balanced correctly. Perhaps the grip gets slippery when the user sweats. Maybe it is not as easy to use as another hammer.
     The problem with the phrase "It is the poor carpenter who blames his tools" is that it is most often uttered by people who are apologists for poor design. These are the people who are most likely to blame the user and not the designer. You can find a lot of these people in the technology business.
     To see this for yourself, run a search on Google for the phrase "poor carpenter blames tools". You will find many instances of people blaming users for problems that are actually problems of design.
     In contrast to the apologists, and those who believe in blaming the carpenter, I believe that they key to progress lies in holding your tools responsible for their actions, blaming them when they let you down, and using that blaming step as the first in a process of innovation.

—————————————————————————————
INTERVIEWS
—————————————————————————————

GEOFF MOORE SPEAKS
I was talking the other day to Geoffrey Moore, author of Crossing The Chasm and a number of other excellent books. He made the following comment that I thought I should share with you...

"Pain has to be divided into pain I can live with and pain I cannot. The 'I cannot' variety is what we mean by the phrase 'broken mission-critical process.' These things create ruptures in the semi-permeable membrane that guards established market pecking orders from barbarian invasions, because the customers saddled with them betray the existing castle in order to get help they cannot get from the incumbent lords. Thus they are key to crossing the chasm. This makes them key to VC investment, because VCs foresee chasm-crossing in every category creation effort. Finally, it makes them key to companies seeking to reinvent themselves out of a bad spot because they make excellent targets for vertical market focus, which is always the key to escape."

In addition to containing a great metaphor, this comment makes the points that all pain is not the same. Different types of pain will lead to different levels of motivation. The best kind of pain is the pain that cause people to actively seek out a solution to their problems. Anyone who has ever sold anything can tell you that this is the easiest sale in the world.
     What we should be doing is developing products that address the needs of people who are actively looking for solutions. This is much less expensive and much faster than trying to get people to believe that they are feeling pain or recognize the pain that they may be feeling. I will explore this topic more in an upcoming newsletter.

—————————————————————————————
RANTS AND RAVES
—————————————————————————————

A BRILLIANT AD
Most ads are so bad that when you see a good one, it really stands out. In this case, the ad is one that is currently running in St. Louis for Southwestern Bell Internet Services. They are selling their DSL services and their main competition is the cable modem.
     The ad that they have crafted is tightly focused on pointing out and hammering home the chief pain point of the cable modem - the fact that it is a shared pipe that degrades as more people in the neighborhood get on line. The advantage of DSL is that each home gets its own pipe and thus doesn't experience any performance degradation.
The concept for the ad is simply brilliant in its simplicity.
We are introduced to a family that has a cable modem and has had to implement some extreme measures to ensure that everyone gets a good high-speed connection. In this case, each member of the family is assigned a two-hour slice of time in the middle of the night when the rest of the neighborhood is asleep.
     The commercial opens with the mother waking the daughter at 2AM. The daughter then gets up and pours herself a cup of coffee and takes over from the brother.
This is a great ad because it is totally on-message. It is laser-focused on the chief benefit of DSL vs. cable modems. SWB is also smart enough to run this same ad with a high frequency so that the message is pounded home - "With DSL you don't have to worry about performance degradations."
Bravo.

P&G GETS IT (MOSTLY)
I was doing some research today and noticed that, if you go to Procter & Gamble's Home Page (https://www.pg.com) you will quickly see that this is a company that gets it. Right in the middle of the home page is a "Help us Create..." link that takes you to a page on which they have a number of different tools that they use to gather feedback from customers on how to improve their existing products.
     This is a great example of a company that has recognized the problem of Insulators and is trying to develop mechanisms to counteract them.
     However, before you get the impression that this is the perfect site, let me point out a few things.
     First of all, I have no idea what kind of process sits behind these pages. Who reads the information that is submitted? What power do they have? Is the information presented in raw form or is it summarized? Is it even used?
Second, the comment form limits you to 255. I find this annoying because it keeps me from being able to say what I want to say. It gives me the impression that they don't want to hear too much from me. In reality, it's probably a limitation of the way the DB that sits behind the site is configured. That is the limit for a text field. They didn't want to use a test blob. However, as a consumer I don't care about that. I want to say what I want to say.
     Third, this part of the site seems fairly PR-ish. There is lots of overly positive stuff. I feel like they are trying to sell me (or worse convince me that I am wrong), not get my honest feedback.
     That said, this site is still a great first effort and an example of a company that is doing its best to connect with its customers.

A MISSED OPPORTUNITY
The other day I had an experience that taught me how and why Insulators exist.
     I was trying to call AT&T Wireless to resolve a problem with my cell phone bill. I had a terrible experience with IVR system and Web site - it's really badly designed. When I finally reached a live person, I told them of my problems. What I got was an "Oh, I'm sorry about that." My sense is that the problem wasn't that she didn't care. I could tell that she did.
     The problem was that she couldn't (and didn't) do anything about it.
     She had no form on her screen to capture that information. She had nobody to tell about the problems. She also had the problem that she is not paid to care about this kind of stuff. The goal of a person in her position is to get people off of the phone as quickly as possible. She can't afford to talk.
     The sad part is that many companies are replacing even these minimally-useful people with computers that will care even less.
     What smart companies will do is recognize that these systems are, in the name of cost control and efficiency, building up walls between themselves and their customers. The goal is to keep the customer at an affordable distance. Of course, this focus on cost control leads to missed opportunities.

COOL TOOL
The following ran in the August 15, 2001 issue of David Weinberg's Journal of the Hyperlinked Organization (https://www.hyperorg.com/current/current.html). I think it's a great example of a pain-based tool...

"It's a little thing, but those of us who don't like filling in forms (i.e., all mammals) and those of us who don't trust Gator (i.e., all primates) can avail ourselves of a handy free utility from PC Magazine. FormWhiz automatically fills in forms on Web pages. It looks at the internal field names in the source document; if it recognizes one, it fills the field in with the data you've supplied. You can configure what it counts as a relevant internal field; for example, you might want to tell it that whenever it sees "cnumb" used as the internal name of a field, it should fill in your credit card number. Flexible but also a pain in the tuchus. FormWhiz has the advantage over Gator of not being just a legal clause away from uploading your marketing-worthy browsing activity; everything FormWhiz does it does on your own machine. You can pick up your free copy at..."

https://www.zdnet.com/downloads/stories/info/0,,77410,.htm

PAIN AND ECOMMERCE
I received the following from one of my favorite authors, Jakob Nielsen of https://www.useit.com, the other day. It points how the pain of the user experience can directly impact the profitability of a Web site...

"User success rates on e-commerce sites are only 56%, and most sites comply with only a third of documented usability guidelines. Given this, improving a site's usability can substantially increase both sales and a site's odds of survival."

https://www.useit.com/alertbox/20010819.html

—————————————————————————————
PICKS AND PANS
—————————————————————————————

BUY CELL PHONE INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANIES
Lots of people are extremely down on the market. People are wondering when, how, and why the market will get going again.
     Well, I can tell you that, if my cell phone is any indication, wireless infrastructure companies still have several generations of growth left. The problem is that my cell phone barely works, but is still an extremely useful tool. I will certainly buy another one (and another one and another one) if it promises better reception (forget PDAs and Internet access).
     What I am going to look for is the QOS equivalent of Qualcomm. That is, a company that can improve the signal quality of cell phones and other wireless devices. Qualcomm grew by using CDMA to tremendously increase the carrying capacity of frequencies. This drove down costs for the vendors.
     What we need is someone to put the same level of focus on solving the QOS problems of end users. This will lead to tremendous growth for this company because, while cell phones are tremendously useful, there still exists a great amount of pain in the marketplace.

THE POWER OF DIGITAL MEDIA
You heard it here first. I believe that Digital Media is going to be the thing that drives the resurgence of the PC industry. The thing is that digital video and digital audio consume tremendous amounts of hard disk space and processor cycles. This will drive upgrades for years to come. It also creates opportunities in the high-capacity swappable storage market.
     All of this makes the current goings-on in the market rather mystifying. I believe that Apple is the only company that gets this, but they have too small of a market share to really start a trend. Microsoft's silence in this market is deafening. If they had their act together, Dell, Intel, and Microsoft should be working like mad to improve the Digital Media (especially video, because of its disk space demands) capabilities of their systems. They should be buying companies like crazy in order to bundle video and audio applications with their systems. They should also be working on the opposite side of the recording companies because what they need is the proliferation of copying, not its restriction. Think razors and blades, folks.

—————————————————————————————
PLUGS
—————————————————————————————

JOHO
One of my favorite newsletters is David (of the Cluetrain Manifesto) Weinberg's JOHO. You can sign up for it by going to...

https://www.hyperorg.com/current/current.html

JAKOB NIELSEN'S ALERTBOX
If you are interested in usability, I highly suggest that you subscribe to Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox. It is full of great stuff...

https://www.useit.com/alertbox/

about | contact | copyright | sitemap